1-05 / Series
1-05 № 05 · 2026

Generic on OSS,
the specific with AI.

The first move is OSS, not code — use it for the generic, customize it for the personal (2-04, 2-10, 2-14), build the foundation for the organization (the Independence part). Only the specific gets written with AI

Customers themselves come to build, paired with AI. But the first move is not writing code. 1-04 showed that a builder does not have to be on the company's payroll. If you can stand on the building side in dialogue with AI, the customer becomes the builder. And the customer holds the business context from the start, so what the SIer used to gather from the outside and translate can be skipped. This chapter looks at where the customer starts.

What you want to build splits into three

It helps to split what you want to build into three: the generic, the personal, and the organization's foundation. The first move differs for each of the three. We take them in turn.

flowchart LR Need["What you want to build"] Need -->|already shared with the world| G["Generic"] Need -->|has to be fitted to you| P["Personal"] Need -->|the whole company sits on it| O["Organization's foundation"] G --> GA["Use proven OSS
(most economical)"] P --> PA["OSS + dialogue with AI
to fit yourself
(2-04, 2-10, 2-14)"] O --> OA["Stand up a foundation with OSS
(replacing M365, Copilot, WordPress)
(the Independence part)"] classDef good fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#7a9a6d,color:#3a4d34 classDef bad fill:#fef3e7,stroke:#c89559,color:#5a3f1a class GA,PA,OA good

Use OSS for the generic, because that is the most economical

Authentication, documents, the database, video conferencing, the web. These generic capabilities are already shared with the world as OSS. Someone built them, released them, and tens of thousands of people hardened them. There is no need to write them from scratch. There is no need to buy them from a vendor either. Just use them. That is the most economical path.

It is not only economical. It is also effective as a security measure. Widely used OSS is exposed to eyes all over the world. Countless vulnerabilities have been found and closed in it. It is far more battle-tested than code you wrote from scratch. It is far more battle-tested than a vendor product whose insides you cannot see.

There is an inversion here that is easy to miss. The attention goes to AI. But most of the generic work is actually carried by shared OSS. The effect of OSS is greater than the effect of AI. AI is only the tool that quickly builds the specific part sitting on top.

For generic things: do not write them, do not buy them. Use OSS. AI takes the spotlight, but OSS is what holds up the foundation.

For the personal, add yourself onto OSS in dialogue with AI

When an individual builds a tool for themselves, using OSS as it comes is sometimes not enough. So you take OSS as the base and customize it, in dialogue with AI, into a shape that fits you. There is no need to learn a framework. Say what you want in ordinary words, try what comes back, and ask again. That is all. What you learn is only how to put into words what you want.

This became possible because the cost of learning fell by orders of magnitude. It used to take months to memorize the syntax, get used to a framework, and get one thing running. Paired with AI, having something that runs takes hours to days. What you gave up on when the unit was months, you try when the unit is days. That line has been crossed.

The worked examples are handled by the Independence part.

Each of these is about an individual who is not a professional programmer building their own tool with OSS and AI.

For an organization, first stand up the generic foundation on OSS

For an organization, the starting point is the same. First, stand up the generic foundation with OSS. Most of a company's software was never something to build; it was something to buy. Microsoft 365, Copilot, WordPress, the vendor packages under the core systems. What replaces them already runs all over the world.

None of this means every piece is finished today. Documents are not a tool to stand up but a way of holding content, and the grid can stay Excel (2-07). For publishing the web, your own machine keeps everything on your side, while Cloudflare Pages means borrowing only the window. Decide separately what to borrow and what to hold — that is what laying the foundation consists of.

First, untie the generic from the vendor. Then put the foundation — identity, data, documents, mail, web, AI — on your own side. On top of that, write only the logic that is genuinely your company's own, together with AI. Writing code comes in the later half, after the foundation is laid. And the amount to write shrinks to the company-specific part.

This foundation-building is the Independence part, Part 2 of this series. One OSS stack at a time, you become independent of Microsoft 365, Copilot, WordPress, the core systems, and GitHub.

An organization's software starts by standing up the generic foundation on OSS. Only the specific logic gets written with AI. The Independence part is that procedure.

What AI cannot do, the SIer cannot do either

Turn all of this over and one strong consequence falls out. The generic can be built on OSS, and the specific can be built with AI by yourself. If so, where is the reason to commission an SIer for the whole thing?

The old reason to hire an SIer was "we cannot build it ourselves." But in the AI-native world, the AI the SIer uses and the AI the customer uses are the same AI. The top-tier model is sold to anyone at the same price (1-01). There is no specially stronger AI that only an SIer can reach. So what AI cannot do, the SIer cannot do either. A problem AI cannot solve gets the people inside the SIer stuck the same way, because they use the same AI.

The SIer's real advantage remains in experience and judgment in the areas AI cannot reach. Genuinely new technology, specialized regulation, cross-organizational negotiation, the pitfalls you only learn from experience. But that is a small slice. Taking it in as advice is enough. It is the same as not handing routine business wholesale to a lawyer or a tax accountant (3-06). The multi-year SIer commission is no longer needed.

The SIer's distinctive capability lives only in the small slice AI cannot reach. The rest, the customer can build with OSS and AI.

Summary

The customer builds the generic on OSS and the specific with AI.

That ends the Introduction part. AI became the strongest SIer (1-01); the unit of maintenance moved to context (1-02); the roles of design and code moved to the builder (1-03, 1-04); and the customer now stands on the building side (1-05). What remains is only the question of what to actually stand up, and how.

The next chapter opens the Independence part. 2-01: Becoming Independent from Microsoft and Google — The Whole Map lays out the whole map and the replacement table, and from there, one chapter at a time, the machine, the data foundation, identity, code, documents, mail, meetings, web, APIs, diagrams, electronics, and AI all move to your own side.


Related articles